Skip to main content

Looking at the police response to the Occupy Wall Street movement, Bull Connor would be proud.

What went barely reported recently was that the United Nations has taken an interest in how the United States has dealt with the Occupy folks. Specifically, Frank LaRue, the UN special rapporteur for the protection of free expression, believes that the law enforcement crackdowns against Occupy protesters are a violation of their constitutional and human rights.

Meanwhile, the Special Rapporteur for Freedom of Expression of the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights, noting the assault by police and arrest of journalists in some cities, urged authorities to protect journalists at these protests.

Why are the local authorities breaking up these peaceful protests -- in which people are exercising their right to free speech -- often through the use of violence, mass arrests, tear gas, smoke grenades, pepper spray, bean-bag rounds and brute force? And why are they beating and detaining reporters, or judges and city council members for that matter?

It all reminds me of Bull Connor, that infamous bull horn-toting, civil rights-era Commissioner of Public Safety in Birmingham, also known as "Bombingham," Alabama. Summoned from central casting, the dyed-in-the-wool white supremacist drew attention to himself when he sprayed water hoses and sicked dogs on peaceful public demonstrators, including children. Those water hoses tore the bark off trees.

And the press caught all of it on tape.

Connor made a fool of himself, and his actions and those of his henchmen were broadcasted before a national and international audience. It put the U.S. to shame, and placed the spotlight on the Jim Crow South in particular. The moral bankruptcy of segregation was evident in the heavy handed tactics employed by the Bull Connors of America.

Then there was the riot by the Chicago police at the 1968 Democratic Convention. And on May 4, 1970, the Ohio National Guard killed four and injured nine unarmed protesters at Kent State University who opposed Nixon's invasion of Cambodia.

This nation, the land of the free, has always known what to do to keep people in line, especially in order to protect capital. Armed thugs, whether dressed in blue uniforms or not, were used by people in power for union busting and strike breaking. The 1 percent never could have succeeded without the complicity and active participation of some members of the 99 percent, including the cops who provide the muscle. Those working class police officers, who certainly will never become rich, should side with the very popular movements that would improve their own condition. After all, as is the case with Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker, union busting includes police unions, too.

The NYPD brass who walked around pepper spraying Occupy protesters, and the UC Davis police who summarily sprayed peaceful student demonstrators, behaved in the time-tested, repugnant tradition of Bull Connor. These days, the key issue is not Jim Crow segregation or the war in Vietnam. Rather, as Naomi Wolf poignantly noted in the Guardian, the Occupy agenda is getting money out of politics, reforming the banks, and stopping politicians from passing legislation affecting Delaware corporations in which they are investors. In other words, they want to cut American capitalism at the knees, eliminate the fraud on Wall Street, and drain the swamp of legalized corruption and bribery that is Washington. They want to get rid of the fundamental inequities of a system to which Americans have become far too accustomed. This is the best tradition of Martin Luther King's "radical revolution of values," what he envisioned as "the shift from a 'thing-oriented' society to a 'person-oriented' society."

Needless to say, there are those who will do what they must to prevent this from happening.

Cities throughout the nation appear to be acting in concert with an anti-Occupy Wall Street strategy. It is no coincidence that simultaneously, police forces throughout the country are violently disbanding Occupy tent cities. The Department of Homeland Security held conference calls with numerous city governments on how to crack down on the protesters. The writing is on the wall.

The police response to the Occupy Movement flies in the face of the reputed tenets of American constitutional democracy, and contravenes the precepts of international human rights law. But hey, this is America. And in America, capitalism trumps democracy. And we can't allow capitalism to become a dirty word, now can we?

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Ohcomeon. (3+ / 0-)

    Bull Connor?

    Read my stuff at burn after writing and The Huffington Post @indiemcemopants on Twitter

    by indiemcemopants on Fri Dec 16, 2011 at 01:48:42 PM PST

  •  Really? (4+ / 0-)

    I mean, criticizing the police actions against OWS are one thing, but a Bull Connor comparison?

    You yourself wrote that Connor's forces

    sprayed water hoses and sicked dogs on peaceful public demonstrators, including children. Those water hoses tore the bark off trees.

    While there have been a few incidents of brutality by police against protesters, there hasn't been anywhere near the level of violence that you wrote about and I blockquoted here.

    Not to mention that the fire hoses and dogs were the official planned tactic against civil rights marchers—not the relatively few and isolated incidents of police brutality, most by a single officer getting out of hand, that have occurred in the three months since OWS.

    This comparison is a bit ridiculous.

    "When I give food to the poor, they call me a saint. When I ask why the poor have no food, they call me a communist." --Dom Helder Camara, archbishop of Recife

    by JamesGG on Fri Dec 16, 2011 at 01:56:32 PM PST

    •  In Oakland the police violence was planned (2+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      Johnny Q, BlackSheep1

      and extreme.

      Here is an example.

      http://www.youtube.com/...

      •  A flash grenade... (2+ / 0-)
        Recommended by:
        SquirrelWhisperer, Eclectablog

        ...is on the level with fire hoses and dogs?

        I'm sorry, there's still a pretty massive gulf between even what happened in Oakland and Bull Connor. The Oakland PD wasn't collaborating with groups of private citizens to look the other way—or help them—to beat protesters with baseball bats, shoot at them with shotguns, shoot fire hoses at them, pelt them with rocks, sic dogs on them, or whip them with rubber hoses.

        There have been zero OWS fatalities at the hands of violence; the violence that met civil rights movement made far too many martyrs. There's no comparison there.

        "When I give food to the poor, they call me a saint. When I ask why the poor have no food, they call me a communist." --Dom Helder Camara, archbishop of Recife

        by JamesGG on Fri Dec 16, 2011 at 02:07:18 PM PST

        [ Parent ]

  •  I'm not sure how else they'd clear the campers (0+ / 0-)

    from the spaces that they illegally trying to privatize.  The campers were expressly trying to make their removal more difficult for the police - that's a direct action stalwart strategy - so I'm hard pressed to see how the cops could remove them except by force.

    •  So, johnny wurster, why must they remove Occupiers (0+ / 0-)

      at all?

      What harm does it do to allow a visual representation of the voice of the 99% remain publicly present and unmolested?

      We both know it's not because people won't step around or over the protestors to buy the crap the 1%ers are selling. This is the USA, after all.

      LBJ & Lady Bird, Sully Sullenberger, Molly Ivins, Barbara Jordan, Ann Richards, Drew Brees: Texas is No Bush League! -7.50,-5.59

      by BlackSheep1 on Fri Dec 16, 2011 at 04:59:00 PM PST

      [ Parent ]

      •  The police are enforcing the law. (0+ / 0-)

        The public has decided that they want to prohibit camping in those spaces.  The campers are shitting all over democracy by throwing tantrums until they get their way.  

        If they want to change the law, they can vote.  

        •  Doesn't sound to me like the public's decided (0+ / 0-)

          Occupy has to go. The banksters and big business guys and local officials they manipulate, maybe. I think the 99% are on the OWS' side.

          And like the cops couldn't spend their time on more efficient law enforcement.

          Oh, and that vote? how do you know they didn't lose that election?

          LBJ & Lady Bird, Sully Sullenberger, Molly Ivins, Barbara Jordan, Ann Richards, Drew Brees: Texas is No Bush League! -7.50,-5.59

          by BlackSheep1 on Fri Dec 16, 2011 at 09:08:02 PM PST

          [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site